Reason for request

New indication

Key points

Favorable opinion in the restricted indication only: as a monotherapy in the adjuvant treatment of adult patients with muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma (MIUC) at high risk of recurrence after complete removal, whose tumour cells express PD-L1 at a threshold of ≥ 1%:

  • who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy;
  • or who did not receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy and were ineligible for and/or refused cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy.

Clinical Benefit

Substantial

The Committee deems that the actual clinical benefit of OPDIVO (nivolumab) is substantial in the restricted indication only: as a monotherapy in the adjuvant treatment of adult patients with muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma (MIUC) at high risk of recurrence after complete removal, whose tumour cells express PD-L1 at a threshold of ≥ 1%:

  • who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy;
  • or who did not receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy and were ineligible for and/or refused cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy.

In the rest of the scope of the marketing authorisation indication, the Committee considers that the actual clinical benefit is insufficient to justify public funding.

 

Insufficient

Clinical Added Value

minor

Considering:

  • the evidence of a gain in disease-free survival compared to surveillance alone in a randomised double-blind study (median not attained (95% CI: 21.19; N.A) in the nivolumab group versus 8.41 months (95% CI: 5.59; 21.19) in the placebo group, HR: 0.55 (98.72% CI: 0.35; 0.85), p = 0.0005),
  • the inability to draw conclusions about overall survival due to the immaturity of the data on this criterion,
  • the toxicity profile marked by the occurrence of adverse events of grades ≥ 3 in almost every other patient,

the Committee deems that on the basis of the current evidence, OPDIVO (nivolumab) provides minor clinical added value (CAV IV) in the adjuvant treatment strategy for adult patients with muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma (MIUC) at high risk of recurrence after complete removal, whose tumour cells express PD-L1 at a threshold of ≥ 1%:

  • who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy;
  • or who did not receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy and were ineligible for and/or refused cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy.

 

 

 


Avis économique 

Ce produit a fait l'objet d'un avis économique rendu par la Commission d'évaluation économique et de santé publique le 30 août 2022. L’avis économique porte sur une indication superposable à celle demandée au remboursement, à savoir les patients adultes atteints de carcinome urothélial infiltrant le muscle (CUIM) à haut risque de récidive après exérèse complète, dont les cellules tumorales expriment PD-L1 au seuil ≥ 1%, ayant reçu une chimiothérapie néoadjuvante ou n'ayant pas reçu de chimiothérapie néoadjuvante et non éligibles/ou ayant refusé une chimiothérapie adjuvante à base de cisplatine.

La CEESP conclut que sous les hypothèses retenues par l’industriel, le RDCR estimé est associé à une incertitude globale majeure.

L’estimation de l’impact budgétaire à l’introduction du nivolumab dans l’indication revendiquée est associée à une incertitude globale majeure.

OPDIVO - Avis économique (pdf)

 

Contact Us

Évaluation des médicaments