TECENTRIQ (atézolizumab) - Cancer bronchique non à petites cellules (CBNPC)
Reason for request
Key points
Disapproval of reimbursement as monotherapy for adjuvant treatment, after complete resection and platinum-based chemotherapy, of adult patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with a high risk of recurrence, presenting with PD-L1 tumour expression ≥ 50% on tumour cells (TC) and not presenting with EGFR-mutated or ALK-gene rearranged (ALK-positive) NSCLC.
Role in therapeutic strategy?
The therapeutic management of NSCLC particularly depends on the stage of the disease at the time of diagnosis. At localised stages (stages I and II), immediate surgical treatment may be proposed for patients deemed eligible (complete excision deemed possible, no contraindication to excision surgery). At the locally advanced stage IIIA, a number of therapeutic strategies may be proposed, depending on tumour resectability and patient operability: immediate surgery, neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery, or radio-chemotherapy followed by immunotherapy.
At stages II or III, platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended for cases of immediate surgery with complete resection, particularly the cisplatin-vinorelbine or cisplatin-pemetrexed association (only for non-epidermoid NSCLC) Adjuvant chemotherapy is not recommended for stage I cases.
In the absence of EGFR mutation, the follow-up treatment consists of monitoring.
Role of the medicinal product
Considering:
- the major methodological limitations associated with the efficacy analyses conducted in the cohort finally selected for the marketing authorisation (particularly sub-group, post-hoc analyses, not adjusted for multiplicity, with no tested interaction, using a different stratification criterion from those used for randomisation), meaning that no formal conclusion can be drawn;
- the adjuvant context, in which an estimated proportion of between 37% and 63% will not relapse (almost equivalent to recovery), without additional treatment;
- the increased toxicity associated with the use of TECENTRIQ (atezolizumab), versus monitoring, in the adjuvant context mentioned above;
the Committee deems that TECENTRIQ (atezolizumab) has no role in the current therapeutic strategy.
Clinical Benefit
Insufficient |
The Committee deems that the actual clinical benefit of TECENTRIQ (atezolizumab) is insufficient to justify public funding in view in the marketing authorisation indication.
|
Clinical Added Value
Not applicable |