TECENTRIQ (atézolizumab) - Cancer bronchique non à petites cellules (CBNPC)

Opinions on drugs - Posted on Jan 20 2023

Reason for request

New indication

Key points

Disapproval of reimbursement as monotherapy for adjuvant treatment, after complete resection and platinum-based chemotherapy, of adult patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with a high risk of recurrence, presenting with PD-L1 tumour expression ≥ 50% on tumour cells (TC) and not presenting with EGFR-mutated or ALK-gene rearranged (ALK-positive) NSCLC.

Role in therapeutic strategy?

The therapeutic management of NSCLC particularly depends on the stage of the disease at the time of diagnosis. At localised stages (stages I and II), immediate surgical treatment may be proposed for patients deemed eligible (complete excision deemed possible, no contraindication to excision surgery). At the locally advanced stage IIIA, a number of therapeutic strategies may be proposed, depending on tumour resectability and patient operability: immediate surgery, neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery, or radio-chemotherapy followed by immunotherapy.

At stages II or III, platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended for cases of immediate surgery with complete resection, particularly the cisplatin-vinorelbine or cisplatin-pemetrexed association (only for non-epidermoid NSCLC) Adjuvant chemotherapy is not recommended for stage I cases.

In the absence of EGFR mutation, the follow-up treatment consists of monitoring.

Role of the medicinal product

Considering:

  • the major methodological limitations associated with the efficacy analyses conducted in the cohort finally selected for the marketing authorisation (particularly sub-group, post-hoc analyses, not adjusted for multiplicity, with no tested interaction, using a different stratification criterion from those used for randomisation), meaning that no formal conclusion can be drawn;
  • the adjuvant context, in which an estimated proportion of between 37% and 63% will not relapse (almost equivalent to recovery), without additional treatment;
  • the increased toxicity associated with the use of TECENTRIQ (atezolizumab), versus monitoring, in the adjuvant context mentioned above;

the Committee deems that TECENTRIQ (atezolizumab) has no role in the current therapeutic strategy.


Clinical Benefit

Insufficient

The Committee deems that the actual clinical benefit of TECENTRIQ (atezolizumab) is insufficient to justify public funding in view in the marketing authorisation indication.

 


Clinical Added Value

Not applicable

Contact Us

Évaluation des médicaments